Search for: "Central R. Co. v. Pennsylvania" Results 41 - 60 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
Hepatitis A is a communicable (or contagious) disease that often spreads from person to person.[11] Person-to-person transmission occurs via the “fecal-oral route,” while all other exposure is generally attributable to contaminated food or water.[12] Food-related outbreaks are usually associated with contamination of food during preparation by a HAV-infected food handler.[13] The food handler is generally not ill because the peak time of infectivity—that is, when the most virus is… [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs, Pennsylvania State University, —The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards Carmen G. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Wendy Netter Epstein Tackling the Social Determinants of Health: A Central Role for Providers Jessica Mantel Elizabeth Y. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:04 am by June Casey
Lessig holds a BA in economics and a BS in management from the University of Pennsylvania, an MA in philosophy from Cambridge, and a JD from Yale. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Originally grew out of access to medicine, and that really is about patents/R&D. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:11 am by Joy Waltemath
Applying Pennsylvania Power Co., an administrative law judge found that the employer did not establish a legitimate and substantial confidentiality interest in the witnesses’ names and job titles, and therefore acted unlawfully by failing to provide them. [read post]