Search for: "Century v. Fitness"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Supreme Court case Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:15 am
But while the Supreme Court’s ruling should have modernized our antiquated law governing design patents to fit into the modern 21st century world, that important outcome is still in doubt pending the retrial. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:06 am
"It does not, in fact, fit. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
The problem has been that Buchanan does not fit the dominant narrative about the so-called Lochner era Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:57 am
[A response to Porter v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Simon Stern, University of Toronto Faculty of Law, has posted R. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:29 am
R. v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:51 pm
I bring this up today, some quarter century plus later, because I have often thought of that exchange when I am asked to discuss preemption under ERISA. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 10:45 am
Yet this explanation does not appear to fit the case of late nineteenth-, early twentieth-century Chicago. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:42 pm
It really is that far divorced from reality.Even though I fully understand that, yes, if the relevant precedent says that it's dispositive whether 45 or more angels can fit, we indeed are required to go through this entirely silly exercise. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
Even after reading the opinion.Look, I understand, we have to do our best, and I appreciate the Ninth Circuit both caring deeply about the issue (it reverses the conviction here because the instruction, while admittedly "accurate", allegedly wasn't "clear enough") and trying their absolute best.But lots of the opinion nonetheless reads like eleventh century theological analyses of how many angels can fit on the head of the opinion, and -- worse -- how… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
"This paradox, like that of George Washington's axe with its three new handles and two new heads, has divided philosophers for centuries. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
On April 17, 2009, the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, issued its opinion in Century 21 Chamberlain & Associates v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
On April 17, 2009, the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, issued its opinion in Century 21 Chamberlain & Associates v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 12:36 pm
(See Bond v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 10:38 am
Ryan v. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am
However, whether the New York Times v Sullivan precedent and its relevant extensions are fit for purpose in the 21st century is a question which is unlikely to go away. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
The big challenge with crypto is how it fits into regulatory schemes that were drafted almost a century a go. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Rhee, University of Florida Levin College of Law, has published The Neoliberal Corporate Purpose of Dodge v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:00 am
Wider questions of morality and justice are made to fit into legal tests recognised by the common law. [read post]
