Search for: "Certification of Question of Law to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review"
Results 1 - 20
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2021, 5:01 am
Last month, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a redacted version of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) opinion and order following a declassification review. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:32 pm
In other words, the FISA Court of Review recognized a foreign intelligence surveillance exception to the Warrant Clause that was novel in two critical regards: (1) in existing alongside and notwithstanding FISA; and (2) in applying even to those searches the primary purpose of which is not the gathering of foreign intelligence surveillance. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:13 am
The centerpiece of the release is a lengthy April 26, 2017 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) memorandum order and opinion approving the new and amended targeting and minimization procedures. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:11 am
An amicus could also petition the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review to certify questions of law for review by the U.S. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:13 am
And resolving the Fourth Amendment claim necessarily turns on the existence (vel non) of the foreign intelligence surveillance exception recognized by the FISA Court of Review in In re Directives. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 10:13 am
It also provides a detailed blueprint for the oversight role of the judiciary, assigning a level of responsibility to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) that is not within the customary "case or controversy" framework and, indeed, that extends beyond the traditional scope of judicial review. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:30 pm
Despite the title, the report is really a condensed history of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC or the Court), with the Brennan Center’s judgements about what has gone wrong with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) itself. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:58 am
Routine matters brought before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), for example, are generally supported by a certification as to foreign intelligence purpose by the FBI Director, Deputy Director or other senior ranking national security official, such as the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 12:39 pm
Under existing law and regulations, the CFIUS review process begins with the parties to a transaction making a voluntary filing of notice. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:34 am
Feinstein did, however, briefly touch on her push to formalize the role of an outside counsel in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court’s consideration of Section 702 annual certifications. 6:48 a.m. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:20 pm
Removal or suspension of Federal officers for misconduct before Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. [read post]
19 May 2013, 8:00 am
Intelligence Community, relatively few officials have the truly deep knowledge and skills to properly perform a blue-sky review of our surveillance laws. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 6:18 am
” Significantly, even Section 702’s critics generally concede that the acquisition of the communications of foreign targets pursuant to a FISC-approved certification is lawful. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
That is remarkably broad provision as it allows the federal court to issue warrants that violate the laws of other countries, including foreign privacy laws. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
" The request was reviewed by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:21 am
One response is that such interception is just the accidental byproduct of otherwise lawful foreign intelligence surveillance activities, but of course, that’s the nub of the current debate. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:52 am
This week, the Senate will vote on five amendments to H.R. 6172, which would reauthorize certain intelligence-related authorities that expired on March 15 and would also make substantive changes to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and related laws. [read post]
15 May 2023, 7:09 am
In 2008, Congress amended the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by adding Section 702, allowing the U.S. government to acquire critically important intelligence from foreign targets using U.S. telecommunications services. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Intelligence Sharing The court summarized the relevant law around intelligence sharing. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:20 am
Document 1: 2015 Certification Government’s Cover Filing This document is the Government’s ex parte submission of reauthorization certifications, amended certifications, and procedures to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for approval. [read post]
