Search for: "Certified Tree Experts Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am
This seemed to have been confirmed by the decision, not long afterwards, in Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
A9020A/S5999-A: Relates to preventing discrimination against victims of domestic violence from housing discrimination A9757/S7800: Provides that programs or activities relating to housing which receives federal financial assistance shall comply with Federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 A9774/S5202: Grants a waiver of the civil service examination fee to persons who have completed the displaced homemakers program or job training program A9924A/S6827-A: Authorizes the dormitory authority of the state… [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The trial court ruled against the lead agency and developer (Gelfand) based upon CEQA claims and violation of the City’s oak tree ordinance. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The trial court ruled against the lead agency and developer (Gelfand) based upon CEQA claims and violation of the City’s oak tree ordinance. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
” Thus, it held the testimony amounted to non-expert opinion unsupported by a factual foundation, and therefore did not constitute substantial evidence. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
” Thus, it held the testimony amounted to non-expert opinion unsupported by a factual foundation, and therefore did not constitute substantial evidence. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
By William W. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The trial court ruled against the lead agency and developer (Gelfand) based upon CEQA claims and violation of the City’s oak tree ordinance. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
” Thus, it held the testimony amounted to non-expert opinion unsupported by a factual foundation, and therefore did not constitute substantial evidence. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
” Thus, it held the testimony amounted to non-expert opinion unsupported by a factual foundation, and therefore did not constitute substantial evidence. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
It cited Joshua Tree Downtown Business Alliance v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm
Hilltop Group, Inc., et al v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
It noted that the County certified an 850-page EIR, and that a lengthy, six-year administrative process preceded the EIR’s adoption. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 8:21 am
She also provides strategic and other supports clients in defending litigation as lead strategy counsel, special counsel and as an expert witness. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
On remand from the state Supreme Court, the 5th District Appellate Court said the arbitration agreements signed by Joyce Gott and her legal representative are governed by the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. 1-16, but unenforceable under the doctrine of mutuality of obligationAutism and Insurance: JUDGE CERTIFIES CLASS IN AUTISM-THERAPY SUIT AGAINST CIGNA, Churchill v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
EXEMPTIONS Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
EXEMPTIONS Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC, Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., and Olin Corporation. [read post]
