Search for: "Chadwick v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
Broccoli, Williams v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 5:35 pm
Plus his name was Joshua.)Anyway, all this happens at the Chadwick Hotel in San Diego, which I've driven past many times and in so doing often wondered who would ever stay there, since it looks like a flop house. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
K&J had argued that a by the way statement made by Lord Templeman in Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 1) [1992] 1 AC 494 to the effect that "I consider that the practice of ordering indemnity costs as a condition of granting relief is ripe for reconsideration" should be followed in preference to Chadwick LJ's statement of principle in Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088 at paragraph 14: "Third, the object of the court… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
K&J had argued that a by the way statement made by Lord Templeman in Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 1) [1992] 1 AC 494 to the effect that "I consider that the practice of ordering indemnity costs as a condition of granting relief is ripe for reconsideration" should be followed in preference to Chadwick LJ's statement of principle in Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088 at paragraph 14: "Third, the object of the court… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As Lord Scarman said in R v Home Secretary ex p. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:00 am
This post was written by Peter Kogan and Steven Chadwick On April 8, 2014, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued its decision in Kraftdev Assoc., LLC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:11 pm
What’s new and legal, the sad tale of Chadwick Boseman and the fact that he didn’t have a will and was going through a state administration very public way. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:55 am
This second appeal stated: The Appeal is without prejudice to the appellant’s appeal against the section 184 decision which she wants to pursue instead… The appellant has not validated the review. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 4:29 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:54 pm
” • In the case of Shirely v Caswell [2001] 1 Costs LR 1, Chadwick, LJ, giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal, stated: “The costs of issues abandoned, or not pursued at trial, ought, prima facie, to be disallowed against the party incurring them on an assessment of the costs of that party by the costs judge - because, again prima facie, they are costs which have been unnecessarily incurred in the litigation. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:30 am
The court in Chadwick v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:18 pm
In Chadwick v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times reports that this issue stems a 2001 court decision in Zadvydas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
