Search for: "Chadwick v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 9:54 pm by Simon Gibbs
” • In the case of Shirely v Caswell [2001] 1 Costs LR 1, Chadwick, LJ, giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal, stated: “The costs of issues abandoned, or not pursued at trial, ought, prima facie, to be disallowed against the party incurring them on an assessment of the costs of that party by the costs judge - because, again prima facie, they are costs which have been unnecessarily incurred in the litigation. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:01 am by sally
(On the application of) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change & Anor [2010] EWHC 2752 (Admin) (02 November 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
K&J had argued that a by the way statement made by Lord Templeman in Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 1) [1992] 1 AC 494 to the effect that "I consider that the practice of ordering indemnity costs as a condition of granting relief is ripe for reconsideration" should be followed in preference to Chadwick LJ's statement of principle in Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088 at paragraph 14: "Third, the object of the court… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
K&J had argued that a by the way statement made by Lord Templeman in Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 1) [1992] 1 AC 494 to the effect that "I consider that the practice of ordering indemnity costs as a condition of granting relief is ripe for reconsideration" should be followed in preference to Chadwick LJ's statement of principle in Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088 at paragraph 14: "Third, the object of the court… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:24 pm by Marlyn Hawkins
This session, Representative Jamie Pedersen of the 43rd Legislative District has prime sponsored SHB 2657, which would fix the rather large loophole identified by the Washington Supreme Court in its May 2009 decision in Chadwick Farms Owners Association v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:30 pm by R.J. MacReady
Click here for a summary of the underlying case.PD-0873-09, State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:55 am
From an extended examination of Chadwick LJ’s judgment in Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, which expressly raises ‘fairness’ on the basis of relevant conduct as the criterea by which share of interest should be assessed, in the absence of express agreement, and Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, which appears to limit ‘fairness’ and expressly concerned shares in a property in joint names, where Oxley v Hiscock… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 4:02 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) E, R (on the application of) v Governing Body of JFS & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 681 (10 July 2009) Secretary of State for the Home Department v QY (China) [2009] EWCA Civ 680 (10 July 2009) Chadwick v Lloyds TSB Bank [2009] EWCA Civ 726 (10 July 2009) Chadwick v Lloyds TSB Bank [...] [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 6:08 pm
  WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT Chadwick Farms Owners Ass'n v. [read post]