Search for: "Chaires v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
”[1] Chair Lina Khan has previously voiced her support for doing so.[2] My view is that the Commission has no such rulemaking powers, and that the scope of the authority asserted would amount to an unconstitutional delegation of power by the Congress.[3] Others have written about those issues, and we can leave them for another day.[4] Professors Richard Pierce and Gus Hurwitz have each written that, if FTC rulemaking is to survive judicial scrutiny, it must apply to conduct that is… [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Gilead does not include the entirety of what used to be the United States, but that aspect of the story is not pertinent to this discussion. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm
In one of the flashbacks that give viewers bits and pieces of the story of the collapse of the old United States and the emergence of Gilead, two of the m [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
Professor Martin Marshall, a GP in East London and Chair of the Royal College of GPs, explains how GPs have been “demonised” for allegedly giving lower standards of care to patients that have cost lives, despite no evidence. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 4:22 pm
ItalyS.G. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
In AMG, the Court rejected the FTC’s interpretation of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which states that the commission “may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin” violations of the law that the FTC enforces. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 am
In Branch v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
Given the United States’ well-documented (and sordid) experience with public-utility regulation, that’s probably not a good idea. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:53 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:02 pm
Around the same time as when Jimmy Lai made public statements calling for sanctions, the United States passed a legislation imposing financial sanctions on officials of China and the HKSAR. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
The Executive Order on digital assets offers six objectives that serve as a natural starting point: protect consumers, investors, and businesses; protect United States and global financial stability and mitigate systemic risk; mitigate the illicit finance and national security risks; reinforce United States leadership in the global financial system and in technological and economic competitiveness; promote access to safe and affordable financial services; and… [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 12:13 pm
In prior cases premised on similar facts, the FEC could not agree whether, following the Citizens United and SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Siegel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 8:20 am
Whether that involves testifying before Congress, speaking at Justice Department summits, or serving in the Administrative Conference of the United States, Professor Levin has defended and advanced a vision of the administrative state that promotes the rule of law, stability and fairness in administration, and effective governance. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
He relegates to a single brief mention the Supreme Court’s summary affirmance in Bluman v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm
" So even someone who is actively thinking about the death of the Constitution of the United States innocently lapses back into the idea that Trump could win in 2024 but then (assuming Trump lives that long) peacefully leave office in January 2029! [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Two years later, the Court followed this up in Pierce v. [read post]
