Search for: "Challis v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm
In dismissing the application in DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis [2015] NSWSC 1567, White J found that the plaintiff failed to show that the statements in the blog were false, ‘or at least materially false’ – a key element of the tort of injurious falsehood. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:55 am
The IPKat's friend, Glasto Guru and 1709 Blogger Ben Challis, kindly drew his attention to this little snippet from the CMU Daily: "Sony changes network terms to prevent future class actions State-of-the-art Play Station in the analogue era ... [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
South Africa is the first Member State that has adopted a customised version of the WIPO manual on this topic. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm
See Pretka v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
Ben Challis (1709 Blog) was quick off the mark with news that Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate (the "Sherlock Holmes" case) is not heading for a US Supreme Court ruling, Tara Aaron (Aaron Sanders) has potted this too, for IP Breakdown. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:52 am
In the UK, where the shirt was a sales success, Rihanna will have to bring her claim within the scope of a passing-off action, as did Eddie Irvine in Irvine v Talksport Ltd -- an action in which a motor racing driver whose image was wrongly used so as to imply endorsement of the defendant's radio service, famously stated that he "wouldn't get out of bed" for less than £25,000. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
On Afro-IP, Caroline Ncube relates the tale of a South African wine brand dispute (Alto v Altus) which ended with Altus preferring a name change (to Fenix) to the prospect of defending a trade mark infringement claim. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 8:27 pm
On the 1709 Blog, Ben Challis signs off with the last CopyCat column of the year and, as ever, it's a cracker! [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
(See CAB entry dated March 2) March 31 – The Supreme Court holds that states may not regulate the types of claims that may be filed as class actions in the federal courts, in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
The Keynote speech [pdf] by Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, John Whittingdale MP. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:43 am
For example, a group may consist of doctors admitted to practice medicine in the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
He is a patent attorney advocate and appeared in the Court of Appeal for England and Wales on Wednesday in Lantana Ltd v Registrar of Patents. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
Ben Challis, writing on the 1709 Blog, reports a not entirely unsurprising but nonetheless significant ruling from the United States that a download is not a performance for the purposes of copyright law. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 3:38 am
Image (c) 2018 Ben Challis. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:53 am
It's Case C-657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology (BEST) v Bert Peelaers and Visys NV. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:44 am
The only exception here is the bits of ACTA that deal with criminal sanctions which, says the Commision require ratification by the individual Member States. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm
He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
”The difficulty here is that many states, having refused to legislate in favour of text and data-mining, are presumably not convinced of their merit. [read post]
