Search for: "Chambers et al. v. District of Columbia"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
In Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Igartúa, et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Juan Romagoza, CJA's lead plaintiff in Romagoza et. al. v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Juan Romagoza, CJA's lead plaintiff in Romagoza et. al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
The case is Sorrell, et al., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am
Initially, it appeared that the nomination eligibility requirement would be fairly innocuous considering, as the SEC noted when approving the new rules, it is generally understood that no laws exist in any state or the District of Columbia that prohibit shareholder nomination rights. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:27 pm
In Jackson, et al v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
- Cassation Court’s criminal chamber orders destruction of 3,123 Abode of Chaos works of art – copyright questions (1709 Copyright Blog) Germany Federal Supreme Court: incidental introduction of new document and due process in opposition proceedings (EPLAW) Federal Supreme Court: Prior use right and contractual arrangements between inventor and alleged infringer (EPLAW) Hong Kong Giorgio Armani not amused by Giormani of Hong Kong (IP Dragon) India Madras… [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:11 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia: Boumediene v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Texas, et al. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
GARZA ENERGY TRUST ET AL.; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-02-00136-CV, 166 SW3d 301, 05-05-05)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment, renders judgment in part, and remands the case to the trial court. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
: (Part 1 - SPICY IP), (Part 2 - SPICY IP) Global – Copyright International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI): ‘Three strikes’ effort hit worldwide home run: (Ars Technica), How to attribute a Creative Commons licensed work: (Molly Kleinman), Chrysalis disappoints, as new artists fail to incubate: (IP finance), DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) Events 26 August:… [read post]
