Search for: "Chambers v. Anderson"
Results 81 - 100
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
Anderson said. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:56 am
Back on PatLit, David Berry considers liability for "divided" patent infringement -- and how a recent US Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit decision in BMC v Paymentech has avoided tackling it full-on. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm
Coulter, Vice President and Chair, Client Development and Growth Practice, Hildebrandt José Cunningham, Chief Marketing Officer, Crowell & Moring LLP Beth Cuzzone, Director of Business Development, Goulston & Storrs Patrick V. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
App. 2000) (opinion withdrawn, but its author dissented from the en banc for this reason, 41 S.W.3d at 366-75 [Anderson, J.]). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here Proposed CERCLA Administrative Settlement; Anderson-Calhoun Mine and Mill Site, Leadpoint, WA. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm
More recently, the Supreme Court decided the case of Presley v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
David Anderson Q.C.'s (now Lord Anderson) Bulk Powers Reviewrecords (para 2.26(g)) an assurance given by the Home Office that that authority is inherent in clauses 205 and 211 of the Bill (now sections 229 and 235 of the IP Act). [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
She works with each justice’s chambers on the syllabus for opinions. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Mata v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
Justice Barry Anderson will give the keynote. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:46 am
In his review of surveillance, A Question of Trust, David Anderson QC indicated that it would, pending the decision in Watson, be appropriate for some requests to be subject to judicial oversight. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Because each party recognized a different Temporary President of the Senate, this political deadlock complicated the conduct of day-to-day business in the Senate chamber. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Anderson Barry I. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
Christina Anderson and Isabella Kwai report for the New York Times. [read post]
