Search for: "Chambers v. Board of Trustees" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 3:42 pm
The Ninth Circuit has only published a couple of opinions in all of November, but the opinion today is a memorable one, if only for its brevity. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  In addition to those mentioned, the Business Roundtable/ Chamber's brief indicated that the following had filed a notice to participate as amicus: Council of Institutional Investors, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, California State Teachers’ Retirement System, State of Wisconsin Investment Board, Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund, Oregon State Treasurer Ted Wheeler, New York City Employees’ Retirement… [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 4:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division then opined that the Retirement System "cannot deny ADR benefits in a case governed by General Municipal Law §207-k by relying solely on the absence of evidence tying the disability to work-related stress," citing Bitchatchi v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm
Sayyed Safdar Hosseini, who is served by a three member managing board (NDFI, About Us, Governance).The Board of Trustees sets overall investment parameters and investment goals, and appoints the Managing Board. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
 Wilson, where the Court held that a legislative censure issued by a community college board did not violate the free speech rights of the respondent, another trustee on the board, in an opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am by Nabiha Syed
In chambers until November, the Justices have left no shortage of topics for discussion during their absence. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Zywicki in Support of Respondent Brief for the Washington Legal Foundation in Support of Respondent Brief for the National Black Chamber of Commerce and the American Board of Trial Advocates in Support of Respondent Brief for the Center for the Rule of Law in Support of Respondent Fifth, there's the oral argument. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Engel v Prentice, 2020 ABCA 462 (CanLII) [26] The appellants argue that the interpretation of the chambers judge leaves s 38.1 of the Election Act without any purpose. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
(“HTI”) which designs and markets hyperbaric chambers. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]