Search for: "Chambers v. Cameron"
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2015, 4:55 am
ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, Lady Hale at para 21 quoted with approval the observation of the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Neulinger v Switzerland (2010) 28 BHRC 706, para 131, that “the Convention cannot be interpreted in a vacuum but must be interpreted in harmony with the general principles of international law”. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 2:00 am
(Links to all the pleadings in the case and other relevant material can be found on the case page):Cameron v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:25 am
Mr Cameron would probably feel a little queasy. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 10:08 pm
Post-Sisvel v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:46 am
Articles and Discussion “Information overload” Seamus Smyth (Carter Lemon Camerons LLP) Solicitors Journal S.J. (2010) Vol.154 No.32 pg.16. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:31 am
Cameron v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
Natasha Holcroft-Emmess is a trainee barrister at Matrix Chambers. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 3:51 pm
Cebryk v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:38 am
Greg Callus is a barrister specialising in media and communications law at 5RB chambers. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:10 am
V. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm
In CG v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 1:50 pm
Spooked by the repeal drive, the Houston chamber of commerce opposed the ordinances. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:25 am
Moldovan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am
They looked at cases on the concept of “public authority” in the human rights context, such as Cameron v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am
Earlier this year, Florida enacted a wide-ranging, complex, poorly drafted, and enthusiastically censorial law, SB7072. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:00 am
A Japanese judge has resigned from the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:22 am
This would be the third such inquiry, with the Baha Mousa Inquiry nearly concluded and the Al-Swaedy Inquiry starting soon. 1 July | UK Supreme Court Decides R (Smith) v SSD « EJIL – We have posted on this important Supreme Court decision, most recently here. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:34 am
; Tweten v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
David Cameron has said that whilst “sputtering over his cornflakes” he decided to legislate to implement filters for adult content. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
On limitation under the 1998 Act, see Cameron v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (formerly Railtrack Plc) (2007) 1 WLR 163. [read post]
