Search for: "Chambers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
GOOGLE … http://t.co/fYtvYiwpf8 -> Three key agenda items for Canada's next privacy commissioner http://t.co/Wp18Sxedqt -> Hebrew U to Pay $300K for Copyright Infringement http://t.co/A2tII4UMRx -> U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:22 am by John Elwood
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 11-663, is yet another hold for United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Doughty Street Chambers has a summary here. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration (06-1210). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 7:09 am by David Oscar Markus
Perkins, 12-126),  clarification of how the Internal Revenue Service calculates the foreign tax credit (PPL Corporation v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
Commissioner may lead the public to question the independence of the Tax Court, especially in relation to the Department of Treasury or the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
Commissioner may lead the public to question the independence of the Tax Court, especially in relation to the Department of Treasury or the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
Commissioner may lead the public to question the independence of the Tax Court, especially in relation to the Department of Treasury or the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Docket: 09-871 Issues: (1) Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in affirming the Tax Court’s interpretation of a statute of limitation resulting in judicial expansion of its jurisdiction beyond the scope set by Congress; and (2) whether circuit courts must consider subject matter jurisdiction in their interpretation of a non-jurisdictional statute, thereby expanding jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:20 pm
Section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code excludes from gross income amounts received from personal injury awards. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs (IPKat) A touch of class: Latest news of IP TRANSLATOR (IPKat) Beware the ‘own name’ defense – AG opinion in Edwin Co (Property, intangible) General Court: likelihood of confusion for Oyster and Oystra (Class 46) OHIM Board of Appeal: nasty decision about the comparison of goods – no likelihood of confusion between MALONE and MALOTE (Class 46) Can a European… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
Commissioner, 12-43, had been rescheduled from the October 3 Conference to be considered with the SG’s petition in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am by Mark Walsh
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, had no fewer than a half-dozen complex (at least to some of us) algebraic formulations. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
On the same day there is an application concerning mode of trial in the case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police before Tugendhat J. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Ranch royalty rate survey (IP finance) FreePatentsOnline: a remarkable symmetry - 'Flash of Genius' sponsorship of Patent Plaque Program (IP finance) Managing external patent specialists (Innovationpartners) The first step to generating revenue from 'patent monetisation' is understanding what the term means (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Think business cannot predict the future? [read post]