Search for: "Chambers v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 21 - 40
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
The CJEU reference in Case C-362/14, Schrems v Irish Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) On April 8, 2014, the European Court of Justice, sitting as the Grand Chamber, delivered its decision in Digital Rights Ireland Ltd (C‑293/12) v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Commissioner of the Garda Síochána, Ireland, The Attorney General. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
Mark Pearson has posted on the Journlaw blog analysing, comments by President Trump on social media and their propensity to make Twitter an “echo chamber”. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm
The Information Commissioner’s recent speech at the Alan Turing Institute on 23 March can be found here. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “Google’s latest acquisition: more than just a bit of data…” The Irish Times had a piece “Data Protection Commissioner investigating micro-targeting on social media”. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
DRE]Joseph Dolley (wiki)Shortly after 1900, Joseph Dolley, Kansas’s state banking commissioner, noticed that the state’s residents, dissatisfied in an inflationary time with the interest on savings accounts in commercial banks, were purchasing the exceedingly dubious securities of newly formed corporations, “beautifully engraved or lithographed certificates of stocks and bonds, which soon proved to be worthless. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:42 pm
Blume v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
We had a comment on the Chamber decision in 2021. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
X, the social network that used to be known as Twitter, updated its privacy policy to include collection of users’ biometric data. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
Socially Aware has published Social Links, a round up of the most important stories in the world of social media this week. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
Internet and Social Media Facebook has released its mid-year transparency report. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
As noted below, the Administrative Court will hear the appeal in the case of R (Chambers) v DPP on Wednesday. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
No 5 Chambers has a briefing entitled “Sexual Harassment in the Workplace. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Read the Commissioner’s original response here and his updated response here. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am
The decision in the House of Lords in Austin v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis, finding that ‘kettling’ peaceful protesters and bystanders for 7 hours did not create a deprivation of liberty, has been heavily criticised; it was expected that the ECtHR would take a different stance. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 17 January 2018 there was unilateral statement in court before Sir David Eady in the case of Chambers v DCR. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom.Inforrm had a Case Preview and the Applicant’s Counsel’s Speech from the hearing.On the same day Tugendhat J heard an appeal in the case of Weston v Bates. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) statement can be read here. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
That should become clearer after the outcome of Liberty’s appeal to the Court of Appeal in its judicial review of the Act and various pending references to the CJEU.Meanwhile the recent Strasbourg judgment in Big Brother Watch v UK (yet to be made final, pending possible referral to the Grand Chamber) has exposed a separate set of flaws in the IP Act’s predecessor legislation, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). [read post]
