Search for: "Chambers v. S"
Results 81 - 100
of 7,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 2:02 am
The domestic courts held that the actor’s right to protection his personality rights prevailed over the public’s interest in being informed, even if the truth of the facts had not been disputed. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 3:42 am
Last week the UK failed in its attempts to reopen and change the approach of the European Court of Human Rights to the deportation of terror suspects: in the case of Saadi v Italy, in which the UK intervened, the Grand Chamber strongly and unanimously endorsed the Court's approach in Chahal v UK, reaffirming that deportation is in breach of article 3 of the ECHR, which prohibits torture and [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 11:43 am
This op-ed by Kyla Christofferson at the California Chamber of Commerce was published in the Daily Journal on January 7, but is now available on-line without a subscription on the Chamber's website. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
In Endnote 43, the Chamber cites to the case of U.S. ex rel Spay v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
This year the Supreme Court Historical Society’s Frank C. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 1:22 pm
Doors open at 5:30 with the Group IV debate at 6pm; then it’s group V, and ending with the Mayoral candidates. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 1:21 am
Lenaerts, President, Arabadjiev and Judges Vilaras, von Danwitz, Toader, Biltgen and Lycourgos and Presidents of Chambers, Juhász, Ilešič, Bay Larsen and S. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:54 am
I was in a judge’s chambers several weeks ago, and it was nothing more than a scheduling conference as my adversary and I were trying to schedule a next day of trial. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 12:24 am
The issue was whether the decision of the Grand Chamber in Salduz v Turkey (2008) 49 EHRR 421 [...] [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
Earlier this month, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down judgment in Mouvement Raelien Suisse v Switzerland (Application no.16354/06). [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
Chamber of Commerce became aware of the hoax in time to actually interrupt the faux press conference, under the auspicies of which the pranksters were announcing an about-face in the Chamber's previously-stated positions on climate policy. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:09 pm
Stanford student John Dalton discusses yesterday’s decision in Chambers v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:09 am
On 14 September 2009 the case was referred to the Grand Chamber at the applicant’s request. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 2:25 pm
Chamber of Commerce is embroiled in controversy over its position on global warming, with -- you guessed it -- members quitting in protest over the Chamber's speech. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 8:39 am
Note that the ECHR's Grand Chamber has held a hearing in the case in late November, so keep an eye out for further developments. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
Citing Begay v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm
Ed. 2d 973 (1980); Levine v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 3:10 pm
The Chamber said that the Ninth Cicuit decision conflicts with the Court’s opinions in both Basic Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 9:19 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
