Search for: "Chambers v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 2,649
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 7:35 am by Jennifer Daskal
With more than 30 amicus briefs filed in the Microsoft Ireland case – including from members of Congress, the European Commission, the Chamber of Commerce, privacy advocates and dozens of media organizations – United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
United States and heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:29 pm
In the case of Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Lech Garlicki, President, Nicolas Bratza, Ljiljana MijoviÄâ [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:32 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Thousands of Whistleblowers At-Risk of Losing Protection WASHINGTON, DC – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES, November 28, 2017 — The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in a major precedent setting whistleblower case, Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 12:34 pm by jmehalik
The American Constitution Society’s Indianapolis Chapter hosted a discussion of the Supreme Court of the United State’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Matt Sundquist
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:03 pm by H. Scott Leviant
For those of you who recognized that the Ninth Circuit got it 100% right when it found in Morris v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
  Margaret Stock argues that states cannot be “assisting” the United States in enforcing immigration law if the United States does not seek that assistance. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:11 pm
Supreme Court of Justice – Labor Chamber, Embassy of the Lebanese Republic in Colombia and Embassy of the United States of America in Colombia Eloïse Glucksmann, Commisimpex v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am by Heidi Henson
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May… [read post]