Search for: "Chambers v. Z"
Results 21 - 40
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
Tugendhat J forbade anyone in Britain from identifying “Mr Z”, who claims to have been defamed by his relatives in a row over a multimillion pound family trust. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 7:00 pm
The appeal to the grand chamber was not accepted by the Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:06 am
Cognizant of the risk, the Court’s Grand Chamber has infused balancing between Article 8 and Article 10 rights with some structure, by setting out a number of balancing criteria in Von Hannover v Germany (No. 2) and Axel Springer v Germany. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
In some ways the case reflects the problem posed by Parkes QC in Hodges v Naish. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:36 am
Pronouncing the English alphabet: I used to get students to write the letters in groups according to the vowel sound, like this (this presumes the British pronunciation of Z as zed - if it is pronounced zee, it goes in the second line instead: A H J K B C D E G P T V F L M N S X Z I Y O Q U W R Many thanks to Martina for this report. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am
Russia, and Yılmaz Yıldız and Others v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am
Following A Ltd v Z (2019) UKEAT 0273_18_2803, it was for the landlords to show that it was unreasonable for them to be expected to know that Ms P suffered an impediment to her physical or mental health and that it had a substantial and long term effect. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:30 pm
The court referred to the six criteria established to balance Article 8 and Article 10, set out in the 2012 Grand Chamber case of Axel Springer v Germany. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 2:39 pm
Ms Z appealed unsuccessful and the property was sold on 18/9/12 with Ms Z ordered to vacate the premises. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 2:39 pm
Ms Z appealed unsuccessful and the property was sold on 18/9/12 with Ms Z ordered to vacate the premises. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 7:10 am
And this decision went a long way to keep cameras out of the Supreme Court chamber. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 1:29 am
The ‘other technique’ of cable retransmission is apparently irrelevant.The CJEU decided in this case without the opinion of the Advocate-General in a small chamber, so maybe it is a slip. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Zăicescu and Fălticineanu v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
The style of the case is, The Burlington Insurance Company v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:32 am
10.45-11.05 Ad hoc arbitration v. institutional arbitration – Ms Carita Wallgren-Linholm, Partner, Lindholm Wallgren, Helsinki 11.05-11.25 New Trends in ad hoc international commercial arbitration: the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules – Ms Corinne Montineri, Legal Offi cer, UNCITRAL, and Secretary, UNCITRAL Working Group II on Arbitration 11.25-12.15 Discussion on Part 1 and Part 2 12.15-13.15 Lunch Part 3: Features of selected Arbitration Institutions 13.15-13.35 Arbitration under… [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
(And this is just a raw comparison of rank v. rank; there are more nuanced issues dealing with the weighted Z-scores, scaling, and the like for another day…. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
(And this is just a raw comparison of rank v. rank; there are more nuanced issues dealing with the weighted Z-scores, scaling, and the like for another day…. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am
Eventually, the AG states that an anti-suit injunction cannot be qualified as a ground of non-recognition for a violation of public policy under article V (2)(b) NYC (paras 160 ff). [read post]
