Search for: "Chance v. Board of Examiners"
Results 61 - 80
of 481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2013, 3:16 pm
.: People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
The new case — Staub v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:18 am
” As Lyle explains, Stern v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
In Florence v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:03 pm
Because the directors are empowered to manage the company's business affairs, a shareholder bringing a derivative action must first make a demand on the board, giving the board the chance to examine the alleged grievance to determine if pursuing the action is in the company's best interest. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 5:28 pm
Hamilton Southside Historic Preservation Association v Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Hamilton, 412 Mont. 519, 531 P.3d 584, 2023 MT 119 (2023) [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
Here, thanks again to the efforts of our dear friend and colleague Alberto Bellan, are the summaries of last week's Katposts which you might not have had a chance to read. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
Novartis argued the Board violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when it relied on Sakai in the Final Written Decision without affording Novartis proper notice and a chance to be heard. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 3:36 pm
The substantive legal test on school library book removals (tracing back to Board Of Education v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
This is the last in a four-part series examining the confrontation. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:06 pm
However, the recent Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Bobek in case C-702/18, Primart Marek Łukasiewicz v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:41 am
This is when a board or commission applies the law to a set of specific facts. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:01 am
Enhancing communication between patent examiners and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), including making it easier for examiners to identify prior art relied upon in PTAB rulings. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
Like the Opposition Division, the Board examined the merits of the opposition by taking into account only the earlier mark. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
This post examines an opinion recently issued by the Supreme Court of Ohio in a “[l]awyer disciplinary proceeding. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
This post examines an opinion the Supreme Court of Ohioissued recently in a lawyer disciplinary proceeding: Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am
Virginia Board of Elections, and Williams v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
National Labor Relations Board; National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:04 am
In the report of his initial examination of applicant, Dr. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:39 pm
There is zero chance of that happening. [read post]
