Search for: "Chancellor v. Chancellor" Results 101 - 120 of 2,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2007, 8:11 am
On Wednesday the Chancellor delivered his decision in Hachette Filipacchi Presse v SIP. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
A couple of weeks ago, I blogged about how Vice Chancellor Will’s decision in Garfield v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
Chancellor Chandler in litigation captioned TravelCenters of America LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  As an empirical matter, is the Vice Chancellor describing the average law student (or perhaps the average law student junky) or is he suggesting that corporate law junkies are more nerdy than average? [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am by Adam Wagner
Patel, R (on the application of) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 2220 (Admin) (27 August 2010) – Read judgment The wife of the purported ringleader of the ’7/7? [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:15 am by Broc Romanek
The Court declined to follow the decision of the Northern District of California in SQL Solutions v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 1:13 pm
Travis Laster and I recently addressed this criticism in an article entitled "Reactions and Overreactions to Ryan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 6:21 am
The frequently discussed but generally unwritten story underlying the three judicial opinions in Verition Partners v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Earlier this month, I blogged about Chancellor McCormick’s decision in Coster v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:05 am
Francis Pileggi has blogged a recent decision by Vice-Chancellor Strine entitled Sample v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:50 am
A panel in Vegas discussed the Delaware Chancery case on Apollo v Huntsman. [read post]
In Liberty Media Corp v Bank of New York Mellon Trust, Vice Chancellor Laster explained the step-transaction doctrine as they apply to claims that a series of separate asset sales over a length of time. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 6:51 am
Since everyone, and I mean everyone (including an ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer writing an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal), has weighed in on the merits of the Stoneridge Investments v Scientific-Atlanta case (to be argued in the Supreme Court... [read post]