Search for: "Chandler v. U. S"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
Case Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Williams Cos. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
In fact, Bruen's focus on text as elucidated by legal history is nothing new in Second Amendment litigation. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm
Five more years would elapse before the sixth lone dissent in Chandler v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Committee for a Better Arvin v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Citizens Bank of Mass., 549 U. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
Chandler, 2 Del. (2 Harr.) 553 (1837); Updegraph v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
Chandler Dawson as inventor. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm
In another unpublished opinion, Gerber v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
U. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
Circuit’s opinion in Latif v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am
The fortunes of the Johnnies did not markedly improve after Kowalski’s arrival, but that was in no way due to the team’s new outfielder. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:52 am
Delaware Chancery Rescinds Poison Pill at Craigslist Here is news from Steven Haas of Hunton & Williams LLP: Yesterday, Chancellor Chandler issued his post-trial opinion in eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]