Search for: "Chaney v. Providence Health Care" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2010, 9:58 am by Cynthia L. May
       Laws prohibiting discrimination trump patient preference regarding the race of health care providers, the Seventh Circuit recently ruled in Chaney v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:51 am by lawmrh
And so Plainfield adopted a policy of honoring the racial preferences of its residents in assigning health-care providers. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (“APHIS”). [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:52 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Chaney, an important Supreme Court decision from 1985. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 1:45 pm by Lorene Park
The note need only be a simple statement that the employee is able to return, but an employer concerned about the adequacy of the fitness-for-work statement may seek clarification from the health care provider (see, e.g., Chaney v Providence Health Care, Wash SCt, No. 87056-0, February 21, 2013). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
Briefly: Lyle posted another article in his continuing series on the health care cases, focusing on the Affordable Care Act’s mandate that employers provide insurance to their workers (the “other” mandate). [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s 1985 precedent of Heckler v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
But the Trump administration should have at least provided a specific figure. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:23 am by SHG
Conflating the policy question, whether deporting people, forcing them to hide, denying them benefits such as education and health care, or turning a blind eye to their immigration status when providing “privileges” such as a driver’s license, is an entirely different question. [read post]