Search for: "Chang v. Chun"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2015, 2:32 am
In 2008, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided, New Jersey v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:17 am
It caused major changes in how the state uses Alcotest machines to collect breath samples from DWI suspects. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:51 am
A case called State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:04 pm
I represented the lead defendant in State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 10:52 am
Chun failed to change the mouthpiece after each breath sample. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:08 pm
However, in the five years since the Chun decision, the State has implemented none of the required software changes to the machine. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:35 pm
Chun. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:28 am
Chun May 2007 Update.pdf [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:27 am
Chun. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 12:11 pm
Chun, in which the New Jersey Supreme Court established strict guidelines for the admissibility of Alcotest results and required multiple changes to the device’s software. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 1:15 pm
Moreover, he holds that there's no reason to change that rule now. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 9:15 pm
Chun Yen Chiu, 857 F. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 6:36 am
Two decisions, State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 7:58 am
Paul Lloyd's Insurance Company v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:50 pm
See Chun and State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:42 am
Chun. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am
REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 2:20 pm
Special master Michael Patrick King ruled, in State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
Bacon et al v. [read post]
