Search for: "Chang v. Chun"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2023, 1:15 pm
Moreover, he holds that there's no reason to change that rule now. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
On 10 May 2022, the annual Queen’s Speech to the House of Commons revealed a number of legislative changes that will affect UK media, data protection and internet law. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
The Society said that while changes were to be welcomed, further reform was needed. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 4:51 am
” Case No. 3: Chun You Cheng v Yang, 2020 NY Slip Op 50801(U) [Sup Ct Queens County July 9, 2020] The opening line in the analysis portion of Commercial Division Justice Leonard Livote’s post-trial opinion last week (read here) says it all: In this case, the parties invested millions of dollars in the construction of a multi-story building. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:13 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Dalmazzi v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 5:20 pm
The Appellate Division rejected this argument in June 2016 in State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 5:20 pm
The Appellate Division rejected this argument in June 2016 in State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 6:36 am
Two decisions, State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 2:32 am
In 2008, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided, New Jersey v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:17 am
It caused major changes in how the state uses Alcotest machines to collect breath samples from DWI suspects. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 11:06 am
Orin Kerr linked to the audio in Klayman v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm
” Despite the promise of negotiations, Chun-ying did make clear that “Beijing will not change its mind on election restrictions,” which put in doubt the ability of any meeting to bridge the disparity between the two sides. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:03 pm
However, in a presentation preceding Putin’s, Russia’s economic minister, Aleksei V. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 12:11 pm
Chun, in which the New Jersey Supreme Court established strict guidelines for the admissibility of Alcotest results and required multiple changes to the device’s software. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:35 pm
Chun. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:08 pm
However, in the five years since the Chun decision, the State has implemented none of the required software changes to the machine. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 7:58 am
Paul Lloyd's Insurance Company v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:51 am
A case called State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:25 am
There have been times in my life when certain words gained meaning all of a sudden. [read post]
