Search for: "Chantell Sackett"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
EPA dates back to 2007, when plaintiffs Michael and Chantell Sackett began backfilling their property with dirt and rock, about 300 feet from Priest Lake. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:47 am
Michael and Chantell Sackett purchased a small lot upon which they planned to build a house. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:02 am
The present case was brought by Chantell and Michael Sackett, who purchased a residential lot near Idaho’s Priest Lake in 2004. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm
In 2004, Michael and Chantell Sackett purchased an undeveloped lot 300 feet from Priest Lake, a large lake near the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:03 pm
Alito opened by explaining the origins of the dispute between the Sacketts and EPA as follows: “Petitioners Michael and Chantell Sackett purchased property near Priest Lake, Idaho, and began backfilling the lot with dirt to prepare for building a home. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:30 am
Schiff, Senior Staff Attorney, National Litigation Center, Pacific Legal Foundation; Counsel for Chantell and Michael Sackett, Petitioners Virginia S. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
The case arose when Chantell and Mike Sackett bought two-thirds of an acre near Priest Lake, Idaho, intending to build their home there. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
It is difficult to argue that this portrayal of the plight of Chantell and Michael Sackett made no difference to the Justices. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Sackett deals with an Idaho couple, Mike and Chantell Sackett, who graded a lot and built a house in the northern part of the state in 2007, described as "their dream house near a lake. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:10 am
Monday, January 9, 2012 10-1062 SACKETT, CHANTELL, ET VIR v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
Petitioners Michael and Chantell Sackett are challenging a compliance order they received from the EPA after the purchase of a small parcel of land in Idaho that interfered with what at the time was classified as protectable waters. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
The issues are being heard through the case of Chantell and Mike Sackett of Priest Lake, ID. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:46 pm
The Sacketts sought further review of the Ninth Circuit opinion (see their cert petition below), asking this Question Presented: Chantell and Michael Sackett own a small lot in a built-out residential subdivision that they graded to build a home. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
The Idaho landowners, Michael and Chantell Sackett, received a compliance order after filling a portion of their residential lot near Priest Lake in preparation for the construction of a home. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
The case arose when Chantell and Mike Sackett bought two-thirds of an acre near Priest Lake, Idaho, intending to build their home there. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:02 am
Mike and Chantell Sackett say the EPA tried to strong-arm them into stopping construction on a vacation home near Priest Lake, Idaho. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:15 am
The justices also agreed to hear the case of an Idaho couple, Michael and Chantell Sackett, for the second time. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:45 am
The Court stressed that it was not deciding whether Michael and Chantell Sackett will win their court case, but only that they had a right to file it at their choosing, now that the EPA “compliance order” is final. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:15 pm
” According to Romney, Mike and Chantell Sackett bought some Idaho property with plans to build a home, only to be blocked by an EPA official who insisted the property contained protected wetlands even though the designation did not appear in the wetlands registry. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
In 2004, petitioners Michael and Chantell Sackett began backfilling their lot near Priest Lake, Idaho, seeking to build a home. [read post]
