Search for: "Chapman, petitioner" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2007, 2:54 pm
I am happy to report that all three petitioners are represented by counsel. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:08 pm by Jon Sands
The 9th used the AEDPA/Chapman analysis (deference) rather than Brecht(actual finding of prejudice). [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:30 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Supp. 2d at 1278 (petitioner waived claim that ‘MSR program violated petitioner’s liberty interest in good conduct time and earned abatement days without due process’ when petitioner ‘did not raise this issue before the military courts, where review would be available’). [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am by Aurora Barnes
Florida and none of the findings required by Hurst were made, the error can be deemed harmless under Chapman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Haltom, appointed by the Court, will argue on behalf of petitioner John Fry. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:08 pm by Kali Borkoski
Perry holding that petitioners lacked standing to appeal from the district court’s order, is here. [read post]
6 May 2008, 7:12 am
Chapman, No. 06-10316 (5-6-08). [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 7:34 am
For instance, Chapman law professor Ronald Rotunda has a new paper discussing King v. [read post]
 The writ names Wolf, Director of the Bureau of Election Services and Notaries Jessica Mathis, and Acting Secretary of State Leigh Chapman as defendants. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 7:19 am
Petitioner then filed a federal habeas petition raising the due-process and other claims. [read post]
Chapman, a case in which the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania was split on the issue and therefore did not issue a ruling. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:34 am by Jonathan H. Adler
§ 1983 and alleging that petitioner Chapman violated the Fourteenth Amendment when she denied Doe access to a judicial bypass for an abortion without parental notification. [read post]
11 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Rotunda is The Doy & Dee Henley Chair and Distinguished Professor of Jurisprudence, Chapman University, The Dale E. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:47 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  This apparently meant that the Brecht test was so difficult for a petitioner to meet that in any case where the petitioner could meet Brecht a state court's holding that he did not meet the much easier Chapman standard would necessarily be unreasonable. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm by John Eastman
Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law and Community Service, and former Dean, at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:35 am by Eve Brensike Primus
The state court had properly noted that Davenport would be entitled to relief under Chapman v. [read post]