Search for: "Chappell v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
LEXIS 17517 (WD MI, Feb. 26, 2010), a Michigan federal district court upheld a prison's refusal, for lack of sincere religious belief, to furnish plaintiff a kosher diet.In Chappell v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:15 am
” Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:45 am
” Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
Chappel he stated that he'd used the computer but never to use KaZaA or download music, despite deposition testimony from Joel that he may have. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:49 am
”): State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
by Dennis Crouch and Timothy Knight On February 21, 2024, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:33 pm
Nor do any of the cases present a question of interfering with internal military affairs, an area that the Court has exempted from Bivens (e.g., Chappell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
King in the Central District of California has just established that Warner-Chappell do not hold any valid copyright in the Happy Birthday lyrics, Merpel recounts.* The "Happy Birthday" saga: when it may have been better not to have sued? [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 8:49 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 5:53 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
In Chappell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:29 pm
(Also, this morning the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Apple v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:26 am
The case is styled Warner Chappell Music Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:26 am
The case is styled Warner Chappell Music Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked goods’… [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 7:54 am
Because returning a long-absent employee who suffered from severe stress to a less stressful shift could be a reasonable accommodation, a federal district court in Florida refused to dismiss a supervisor’s ADA and state law claims despite UPS’ argument that attendance was an essential function and she was not “qualified” due to her absence (Markwart v United Parcel Service, July 24, 2013, Chappell, S). [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
Tina ChappellTina Chappell (Associate General Counsel, Intel Corporation) was next up. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:24 am
State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
Cameron (@JasmineDCameron) Trump – Intelligence Community Trump’s States Goals for the U.S. [read post]
