Search for: "Charles Dunlap, Jr." Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2021, 10:39 am by Legal Talk Network
Dunlap Jr., former deputy judge advocate general of the United States Air Force, and professor from Duke Law. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 10:39 am by zbrown
Dunlap Jr., former deputy judge advocate general of the United States Air Force, and professor from Duke Law. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Not in the office of then-Judiciary Committee Chairperson Charles Grassley, which was copied on the letter. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:37 am by Adam Faderewski
• Nancy Kliewer Dunlap, 72, of Dallas, died January 21, 2019. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:37 am by Adam Faderewski
• Nancy Kliewer Dunlap, 72, of Dallas, died January 21, 2019. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 10:21 am
Dunlap, Jr., Targeting of Persons: The Contemporary Challenges R. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 7:00 am by Raphael S. Cohen
. *** A quarter century ago, in a widely read piece in the military journal Parameters, now-retired Major General Charles Dunlap warned of several troubling trends in American civil-military relations that, if left unchecked, could have disastrous effects for democracy. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 2:03 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Charles Dunlap, Jr. will also appear on the panel. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:21 am by Quinta Jurecic
Winnefield Jr. of the Joint Chiefs (who seemed firmly against the introduction or use of security vulnerabilities) and Director of the NSA Admiral Michael Rogers (who implied the opposite). [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:37 pm by Nate Russell
Dunlap, Jr., Deputy Judge Advocate General for the U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Dunlap, Jr., Some Observations on Gabriella Blum’s ‘Fog of Victory’ Michael Walzer, Coda: Can the Good Guys Win? [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:25 am by Ritika Singh
Charles Dunlap Jr. of Duke Law School argues in NewsObserver.com that the DOJ White Paper released on Monday provides a further peek at the Obama administration’s policy on targeting U.S. citizens—but “[w]hat is now needed is a formal, detailed and very comprehensive U.S. legal position. [read post]