Search for: "Charles v. Charles" Results 1 - 20 of 7,329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am by Chris Castle
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
Cathérine Van de Graaf, Strasbourg Observers: Georgian Muslim Relations and Others v Georgia – a bleeding pig’s head and other expressions of religious hatred with no police intervention: we noted the case here. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:45 am by Unknown
 2024/I/3 (Charles Univ., April 2024) [text via SSRN]The externalisation of European refugee protection: A legal, practical and political assessment of current proposals, SWP Comment, no. 13 (Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, March 2024) [text]"Housing and temporary legality: The evictability and settlement of refugees in Swedish municipalities," Critical Social Policy, OnlineFirst, 23 April 2024 [open access]"Navigating the legal liminalities of a de facto state:… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Adam Dodek
Other tributes noted his participation in the landmark case of Halpern v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Maril, Originalism and Democratic Decline, ( Maryland Law Review, Forthcoming).Howard Wasserman & Charles W. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case law is still developing in this area.The case is Whittaker v. [read post]