Search for: "Chatham Towers, Inc. v Castle Restoration & Constr., Inc." Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2019, 4:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To support its argument, Moretrench cites the decision of the Appellate Division, First Department, in Chatham Towers, Inc. v Castle Restoration & Constr., Inc. (151 AD3d 419 [I st Dept 2017]), which held that: “Common-law indemnification may be pursued by parties who have been held vicariously liable for the party that actually caused the negligence that injured the plaintiff. [read post]