Search for: "Cheek v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2011, 7:03 pm
Heddon, 149 U.S. 304 (1893), in which the Supreme Court of the United States had to decide whether at tomato is a fruit or a vegetable for purposes of the Tariff Act of March 3, 1883. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
It held in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
(Joinder; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
Therefore, in Cheeks v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:34 pm
Cheek v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 pm
E.g., United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:00 am
As reported on the Hunton Employment and Labor Law Blog, the United States Supreme Court has denied a restaurant manager’s petition seeking review of whether parties may stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of a lawsuit alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), or whether judicial or Department of Labor (“DOL”) approval is a prerequisite to such a dismissal, as the Second Circuit held in his case, Cheeks v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:16 pm
At issue is whether the STB and the second respondent, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), complied with their obligations under § 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to ensure that the proposed rail was "not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species" before approving the exemption. 16 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Also, King involves privacy in new technologies The nine-to-zero vote in the recent GPS decision, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 6:611, 616 (1998).)This insight may help untangle some of the discursive trajectories in the case and the declaraitons. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:50 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm
If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States Wired suggests that the state of Utah has become a leader in digital privacy with the passing of a new privacy law. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
In a recent post, Mike Dorf (tongue firmly in self-referential cheek) announced "Dorf's Law," which "states that courts do not provide a remedy for really really big constitutional problems where doing so would create chaos. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
Caballes (2005) and United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
In criminal context, see United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:26 pm
See Cheek v. [read post]
