Search for: "Cheeks v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2015, 2:03 pm
[Legal Cheek] * King v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
Using state law, they swabbed King's cheek to get a DNA sample, and then submitted the sample to the federal DNA database to see if there were any matches. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
In criminal context, see United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
In Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB) the High Court considered the appropriate level of damages to award against a fan of the club for libellous statements made on an online forum. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 5:23 am
The Colorado Supreme Court site has this item on one of its pages: People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 12:43 pm
Wood v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:51 am
” More commentary on Friedrichs v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm
As for the cheek swab, you may view it as a de minimis intrusion that pales in comparison to state mandates that clearly-innocent children receive, in the name of public health, much more invasive, risky, and repeated vaccination shots. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm
If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Professor Madison, however, suspects an intentional end-run around reverse engineering fair use law by intentionally asserting only state-law contract claims, copying the proceedings in Bowers v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 10:26 am
Swiderski v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In Hinebaugh v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:35 pm
Cheek v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 12:33 am
But they also included a cheek plate and a top plate. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:20 pm
The case, People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
” Cheek v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:30 pm
” Justice Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:50 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
But in Georgia v. [read post]
