Search for: "Chevron U S A Inc"
Results 41 - 60
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., courts should defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:05 am
See Chevron U. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 10:53 am
S. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Company – Chevron v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 2:00 pm
See Chevron U. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Tailoring deference to variety with a wink and a nod to Chevron: the Roberts Court and the amorphous doctrine of judicial review of agency interpretations of law. 36 J. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
[2] Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Landis+GYR Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:11-CV-317 (E.D. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:28 am
Moreover, even if the SSA’s longstanding interpretation is not the only reasonable one, it is at least a permissible construction entitled to deference under Chevron U. [read post]
30 May 2017, 12:34 pm
Applying the Supreme Court’s seminal 1984 decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:16 am
The justices do not back away from the principle articulated in 1984 in Chevron U. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
64 U. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:58 am
Chevron U. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am
The Court concluded that since the statute was ambiguous and the Secretary’s interpretation reasonable, the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am
The Court concluded that since the statute was ambiguous and the Secretary’s interpretation reasonable, the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am
The Court concluded that since the statute was ambiguous and the Secretary’s interpretation reasonable, the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am
The Court concluded that since the statute was ambiguous and the Secretary’s interpretation reasonable, the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:11 pm
The Fourth Circuit viewed the Act as ambiguous, and deferred to the IRS’s interpretation under Chevron U. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:40 pm
" 33 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm
See, e.g., Christopher, 567 U. [read post]
