Search for: "Chevron U S A Inc" Results 81 - 100 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
For the Georgia case’s purposes, the most relevant is Supremacy Clause immunity. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 9:35 am
Chevron USA, Inc., 544 U.S. 528 (2005); and the infamous eminent domain decision Kelo v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
”[29] And that’s a short list. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 11:53 am by Tom Kosakowski
Ellen Schreiber, Ombuds, University of Idaho)Using Mediation as a Mean to a More Peaceful Society (Tsipora Dimant, Mediator/Facilitator/Instructor, Portland Community College)Improving interactions between Ombudsmen and Compliance Officers/Inside Counsel (Ilene Butensky, Eaton Corporation)Emotional Well-Being - R U OK? [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Bexis
Metabolife International, Inc., discussed the inapplicability of FDA regulatory standards to tort cases at some length:[U]se of FDA data and recommendations raises a more subtle methodological issue in a toxic tort case. [read post]
These justices have shown contempt for Chevron deference, a doctrine upholding a government agency’s interpretation of a statute that the agency administers. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:10 pm
-Cuba Trade and Economic Council, Inc.New York, New YorkTelephone (917) 453-6726 • E-mail: council@cubatrade.org Internet: http://www.cubatrade.org • Twitter: @CubaCouncil Facebook: www.facebook.com/uscubatradeandeconomiccouncil LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/u-s--cuba-trade-and-economic-council-inc- The following are excerpts from an “on background” interview by the Economic Eye On Cuba© with two senior-level officials in the Trump… [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
  The panel’s Chevron Step Zero analysis is arguably flawed.[7] The Court rejected Skidmore deference as well, finding the agency’s interpretation of the statute unpersuasive.[8] Id. [read post]