Search for: "Child Support Enforcement Agency v. Doe" Results 81 - 100 of 556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Support Magistrate directed the mother to pay child support of $464 per month. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
This was false: other law enforcement officials had reviewed the DVDs and had found no child pornography. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
An internet search engine or service provider detects child pornography and then reports the contraband to NCMEC, which verifies and reports to the appropriate law enforcement agency. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
Ed. 2d 831; United States v Gorrell, 360 F Supp 2d 48, 55 n 5 [“The warrant did not limit the amount of time in which the government was required to complete its off-site forensic analysis of the seized items and the courts have not imposed such a prophylactic constraint on law enforcement”]; United States v Triumph Capital Group, Inc., 211 FRD 31, 66 [the Fourth Amendment does not “impose any time limitation on the government’s forensic… [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:34 pm by Craig Newby and Jeffrey Conner
” DACA recipients are students and teachers, military service members, law enforcement officers, fire fighters, health care workers, child and elder care workers, and treasured friends and neighbors. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:24 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Shon’s expert, a German-licensed attorney, stated that the temporary sole-custody order would not be enforceable because Germany does not recognize ameliorative measures. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:07 pm
DOES BANKRUPTCY LAW CONSIDER A DEBT OWED TO A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, FOR LIVING EXPENSES UNRELATED TO A SEPARATION OR DIVORCE, TO BE CHILD SUPPORT? [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:45 am by Madelaine Lane
  The Michigan Paternity Act only confers standing on three classes of individuals to file a paternity suit: 1) the mother of a child born out of wedlock; 2) the father of a child born out of wedlock; and, 3) the Family Independence Agency on behalf of a child born out of wedlock and supported by public assistance. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 6:48 pm
Grants also are authorized to law enforcement agencies for fingerprinting programs for children; and to government and nonprofit organizations for purposes of establishing and improving child Internet safety.Section-by-Section Summary of the ActTitle I: Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act Sec. 111. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
In order to further support his broad definition of “distribution”, Judge Gorsuch relies on U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
On appeal it was held that the lawyer's threat to report a crime to enforcement agencies, coupled with a demand for money, constituted extortion even when the plaintiff in fact committed the crime and owed the money. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Convention itself does not define what constitutes a child being "settled in its new environment. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 1:45 pm by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
., wrote a blog post discussing the recent Appellate Division case of Ricci v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:32 am by Thomas J. Crane
She reported the unlawful request to her superiors within the Child Support Enforcement Division. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm by Larry
Such is the case in Ninestar Corporation et al. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm by Pamela Wolf
The test is drawn from EEOC Enforcement Guidance No: N-915.002, the comprehensive, updated agency guidance on the use of criminal history in employment decisionmaking that was issued on April 25, 2012. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]