Search for: "Child v. Social Security Administration"
Results 61 - 80
of 547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
Shortly after the twins were born, Karen Capato applied for child’s insurance benefits for them, but that application was denied – first by the Social Security Administration (SSA) and then in a hearing before an administrative law judge. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:29 pm
H.R.4348 - To remove administrative barriers to participation of Indian tribes in Federal child welfare programs, and increase Federal funding for tribal child welfare programs, and for other purposes. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:11 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Olumba, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 408 (20 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Incorporated [2008] EWCA Civ 192 (19 March 2008) Jurkowska v Hlmad Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 231 (19 March 2008) T (a child) v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 199 (19 March 2008) Heath & Hampstead Society, R (on the application of) v Vlachos… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:01 am
Simply because the Social Security Administration has determined that a person is disabled does not necessarily mean that the person is incapable of performing everyday tasks. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm
The mother’s application for an injunction to restrain the vaccination was accordingly dismissed, for several reasons [23]: she had not produced “cogent, objective medical and/or welfare evidence demonstrating a genuine contra-indication to the administration of one or all of the routine vaccinations” [24]; in the absence of cogent, objective evidence of harm to WSP’s welfare, her objections on religious grounds did not otherwise outweigh the child’s… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
Steven was receiving disability benefit from the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the NJ office of child support ( the NJ state agency which is in charge of collecting child support) sent a garnishment order to the SSA. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:14 am
Taking the case on to the Supreme Court, the Social Security administrator, Michael J. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
The Child Poverty Action Group (Respondent) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions(Appellant) [2010] UKSC 54 – Read judgment / press release The Supreme Court has ruled that where benefits are overpaid as a result of a mistaken calculation, the department responsible cannot claim these amounts back via the common law route of restitution; the Secretary of State’s only recourse is via Section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
In 1987, someone, most likely Doe, used V's birth certificate, name, and social security number to obtain a `replacement’ social security card from the Social Security Administration. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Barrett dissented, concluding that the Department of Homeland Security’s interpretation was reasonable. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 8:28 am
Social Security Administration (SSA) runs the program due to political reasons and budgetary constraints. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:05 pm
This suspension is based upon an Action Transmittal dated June 18, 2012 from the Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement to all state agencies administering child support enforcement plans under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:25 pm
Div. 2001), the Appellate Division held that a family court adjudicating support obligations must give appropriate deference to a determination by the Social Security Administration (SSA) that a party is disabled. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:46 am
Just as the states can learn from the history of state initiatives, so too might the Bush administration and its allies in Congress learn from their party's lost and futile attacks on social security and medicare. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:53 pm
As part of this program she must account for all payments to the Social Security Administration on a yearly basis. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:39 pm
In fact, the Child Support Guidelines includes, but is not limited to 23 possibilities for income, as follows: a. compensation for services, including wages, fees, tips, and commissions; b. the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses (see IRS Schedule C); c. gains derived from dealings in property; d. interest and dividends (see IRS Schedule B); e. rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses - see IRS Schedule E); f. bonuses and royalties; g. alimony… [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm
Simcox v. [read post]
