Search for: "Child v. Social Security Administration"
Results 81 - 100
of 547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Windsor, invalidating a provision of the federal Defense of Marriage that defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman for purposes of federal laws and programs, the Social Security Administration has amended its operating manual to address claims for benefits for same-sex couples. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
The Social Security Administration didn't like this ruling, but it acquiesced to it -- albeit in the Ninth Circuit only.Meanwhile, in California, another tragedy was taking place. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
Social Security Administration (SSA). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
To remind us that legislators may appeal to their own moral convictions and to claims about social utility to reshape the law as they think it should be in the future. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 3:14 pm
For a disabled adult to be entitled to this “child” benefit, one of his or her parents:• Must be receiving Social Security retirement or disability benefits; or• Must have died and have worked long enough under Social Security.SSI v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:05 am
There, the Appellate Division found that the trial court erred by retroactively modifying the payor spouse's child support obligation to June 2005, the month in which he was declared disabled by the Social Security Administration, rather than as of the date of the payor's motion to modify his support obligation in October 2008. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am
She claimed disability via the Social Security Administration stemming from her diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
She claimed disability via the Social Security Administration stemming from her diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm
H.R. 8954 - To amend part B of title IV of the Social Security Act to require States to comply with Federal standards established under the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 10:52 am
The Court held that a Tennessee state court had jurisdiction to hold a disabled veteran in contempt for failing to pay child support, rejecting the argument that only the Veteran's Administration and Social Security Administration could determine what child support payments could be ordered paid from disability benefits, which constituted the father's sole income. 2) Fullilove v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
Problem In 1978, Congress enacted the Indian Child Welfare Act to address the “alarmingly high percentage of Indian families […] broken up by the removal, often unwarranted, of their children from them by nontribal public and private agencies and institutions,” as well as the fact “that the States, exercising their recognized jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings through… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 19, 2011Briscoe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm
Federal Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2018.htmlState of Texas v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm
Federal Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2018.htmlState of Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
Supreme Court of Florida.Child support -- It was an abuse of discretion for trial court to fail to set amount of child support obligation before applying amount of child's derivative social security disability benefit -- Court should have calculated monthly child support obligation, explicitly included that amount in final judgment, and only then applied derivative benefits to reduce or pay that obligation -- Nevertheless, court reached correct result… [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm
Nicholson (Notice; Child Custody) Barreto v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
At issue was whether a child conceived through artificial insemination more than a year after her father's death qualified for benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 402, 416. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
At issue was whether a child conceived through artificial insemination more than a year after her father's death qualified for benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 402, 416. [read post]
