Search for: "Childs v. Social Security Administration Commissioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 9:14 am
The Social Security Administration (SSA) has taken the view that posthumously conceived children can qualify as “children” only through the state law intestacy provision in 42 USC §416(h)(2)(A). [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:38 pm
The Social Security Administration (SSA) denied the claim initially and upon reconsideration. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am
It was an integral part of the move to combine tax allowances and social security benefits into a seamless tax credit system [30]. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:55 am
Commissioner, Social Security Administration (New Hampshire Supreme Court, August 9, 2007), opinion here. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
Read the full opinion for a complete analysis: Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:09 pm
Commissioner of Social Security. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am
A year later, the Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
Shortly after the twins were born, Karen Capato applied for child’s insurance benefits for them, but that application was denied – first by the Social Security Administration (SSA) and then in a hearing before an administrative law judge. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
The Child Poverty Action Group (Respondent) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions(Appellant) [2010] UKSC 54 – Read judgment / press release The Supreme Court has ruled that where benefits are overpaid as a result of a mistaken calculation, the department responsible cannot claim these amounts back via the common law route of restitution; the Secretary of State’s only recourse is via Section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
At issue was whether a child conceived through artificial insemination more than a year after her father's death qualified for benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 402, 416. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
At issue was whether a child conceived through artificial insemination more than a year after her father's death qualified for benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 402, 416. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 1:03 am
Plaintiff filed two applications: one for Childhood Disability Benefits as a Disabled Adult Child and another for Supplemental Security Income benefits. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 19, 2011Briscoe v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia November 11, 2011 Farris v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Court of Appeals Paternity - Defense of Equitable Estoppel - Applied to Deny Non-Biological Father Right to Deny Paternity In Commissioner of Social Services on Behalf of Elizabeth S. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
As stated in a study by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the relationship between climate change and the full and effective enjoyment of the rights of the child: The negative impacts of climate change on children trigger obligations among all duty bearers to take action to protect all children from its actual and foreseeable adverse effects. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
November 16, 2018Matrimonial Rules and Forms Revised Effective September 30, 2018By administrative order of the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts section 202.50(b)(3) of the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court and the County Court (22 NYCRR § 202.50[b][3]), were amended effective September 30, 2018. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
November 16, 2018Matrimonial Rules and Forms Revised Effective September 30, 2018By administrative order of the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts section 202.50(b)(3) of the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court and the County Court (22 NYCRR § 202.50[b][3]), were amended effective September 30, 2018. [read post]
