Search for: "Childs v. State of California (1983)" Results 41 - 60 of 184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2016, 7:36 am
This post examines an opinion from the California Court of Appeals – First District, Division 1. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
Nunnemaker (which has been the subject of other relisted petitions in the past year), it should look to the last opinion in lower California state court, which was a decision based on procedural grounds, to decide that it could turn to the merits without affording the state courts deference. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
 Indeed, it appears that any age is okay in California. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
He argued that the prosecution was itself a form of detention under the Fourth Amendment that he could Sue under Section 1983 for damages. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 10:59 am by Ettinger Law Firm
Even federal Courts recognize and enforce this legal principle, as found in Kuchenig v California Co., 410 F.2d 222 (5th Cir. 1969). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
District Court for the Northern District of California:  U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
” In 1983 the ABA approved these new Model Rules and again urged state courts to adopt them. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:33 am
Thomas, 2015 WL 778839 (California Court of Appeals 2015). [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Iskanian, 14-341 allows us to linger a bit longer in California. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Constitution; and (2) whether Ohio’s refusal to recognize a judgment of adoption of an Ohio-born child issued to a same-sex couple by the courts of a sister state violates the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. [read post]