Search for: "Childs v. State of California (1983)"
Results 61 - 80
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
§ 1983. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:04 pm
The types that are must be authorized by a California statute. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
§ 1983. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
§ 1983. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
New York, unlike other states (such as California), does not grant divorces based on irreconcilable differences. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court of California, January 21, 2010 People v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
State Water Contractors v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Defendant also argues that his 360-month sentence of incarceration is unreasonable in light of United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., No. 05-75295, 05-76217, 05-77116 Six restrictions on expressive activity promulgated and enforced by two California shopping malls infringe on the free speech rights guaranteed by the California State Constitution, and therefore interfere with protected union activity in violation of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when applied to union picketing and handbilling actions. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:49 am
Taxation With Representation of Wash., 461 U.S. 540, 549 (1983). [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 9:58 am
Haning, Flahavan, Kelly, et al., California Practice Guide - Personal Injury (Rutter 2006) §5:138, likewise states: Neither C.C.P. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, 944–59 (1983) (separation of powers); Plaut v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Wilder, No. 06-2213 Conviction for possession, transmission, and receipt of child pornography is affirmed over defendant's claims that: 1) the warrant permitting seizure of materials from his home was issued without probable cause; 2) the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish his knowingly receipt or knowingly possession of child pornography; and 3) the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that the photographs on which the convictions were based depicted… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:00 am
" South Bay Chevrolet v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Miller, No. 06-5187 Conviction and sentence for receiving child pornography, possessing the same images of child pornography, and marijuana possession is vacated and remanded for re-sentencing where: 1) although defendant's conviction for receiving child pornography was supported by substantial evidence, double jeopardy barred convictions for both receiving and possessing the same images of child pornography; and 2) defendant's testimony regarding his… [read post]
