Search for: "Childs v. State of California (1983)"
Results 121 - 140
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Mason, 527 F.3d 252, 255 (2d Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:23 am
There have been occasional exceptions to courts' general unwillingness to intervene in this area, such as in the 1983 California case of Barbara A. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Fancher, No. 06-4913 "480-month sentence based on guilty plea to receiving child pornography is vacated where the district court did not provide sufficient notice that it was considering an above-Guidelines sentence. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
http://j.st/GqZ United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Beard, No. 07-3711 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit by prison inmates challenging the confiscation of legal materials by state corrections officials, dismissals of some claims and summary judgment for defendants on the remainder are affirmed where: 1) plaintiffs did not allege an actual injury in their claim of loss of access to the courts; 2) defendants demonstrated a legitimate governmental interest in stopping inmates from filing fraudulent liens and judgments against… [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Nunnemaker (which has been the subject of other relisted petitions in the past year), it should look to the last opinion in lower California state court, which was a decision based on procedural grounds, to decide that it could turn to the merits without affording the state courts deference. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
He argued that the prosecution was itself a form of detention under the Fourth Amendment that he could Sue under Section 1983 for damages. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 04, 2008 State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court also affirmed the grant of summary judgment on plaintiff's ineffective assistance of counsel claims, premised on 42 U.S.C. 1983 and Monell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court also affirmed the grant of summary judgment on plaintiff's ineffective assistance of counsel claims, premised on 42 U.S.C. 1983 and Monell v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Concepcion (Federal Arbitration Act preemption of California rule that a waiver of class arbitration in a consumer contract may be unenforceable) Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Hepp, No. 07-4079 In a prosecution for the sexual assault of a child, denial of a petition for habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) the state court's denial of defendant's request to present an alternative theory of the victim's injuries was not objectively unreasonable; and 2) there was no evidence that the sentencing judge relied on inaccurate information. . [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
That was the ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am
One child was hospitalized. [read post]
