Search for: "Childs v. Williams" Results 1 - 20 of 1,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2008, 5:42 pm
Williams holds that this is indeed so.The oddity in the case is that the person convicted didn't actually have any images that constituted child pornography. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:13 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Williams appeals from a judgment convicting her of one count of child neglect resulting in death and three counts of forgery and from an order denying her postconviction motion for resentencing. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:28 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury instructions — Malicious acts A jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County convicted Craig Williams, appellant, of first-degree child abuse. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:39 am by tracey
Williams v Essex County Council: [2011] EWCA Civ 1315;  [2011] WLR (D)  329 “A statement of special educational needs automatically lapsed when a person ceased to be a child, which was at 19 years. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:07 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Waiver of jury trial — Knowing and voluntary Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Cecil County, Michelle Williams, appellant, was convicted of child abuse, rendering a child in need of assistance, and two counts each of second-degree assault and intercepting oral communications. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 9:20 pm
Williams where the Court upheld a federal statute that criminalized the pandering of child pornography. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:10 am
Williams, the case Eugene blogged about a bit involving First Amendment challenges to 18 U.S.C. 2252A(a)(3)(B), a child-porn-related... [read post]
  Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:13 pm
Williams [LII case backgrounder; merit briefs], 06-694, to determine whether part of the federal anti-child abuse PROTECT Act of 2003 [PDF text] is unconstitutional for criminalizing speech protected by the First Amendment. [read post]