Search for: "China Steel Corp. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Our case of the day, Samsun Logix Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
From 1986 until November 2006, U.S. law on the subject of non-market economies had been governed by a Court of Appeals decision, Georgetown Steel Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:02 pm
Last week, CIT Chief Judge Jane Restani issued an important decision (PDF) in the case of GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:57 am
The CAFC responded on May 9, 2012 by sending the case titled GPX International Tire Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:27 am
Statements in Gulf Oil Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 7:07 pm
Chenery Corp. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
Most of that drama has centered on the court case that first led to the CVD/NME law's implementation (GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
The United States complained to the WTO about China’s support of wind turbines; the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
The United States complained to the WTO about China’s support of wind turbines; the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:19 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:20 am
In the 1986 case Georgetown Steel Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
See Steel Co. v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 10:30 am
United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
GPX Int’l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 4:24 pm
United States and amending the US countervailing duty law to expressly apply to imports from "non-market economies" like China and Vietnam. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm
The law permits a president to “deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,” if he first declares a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA). [read post]
