Search for: "Chiu v Chiu" Results 1 - 20 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2009, 12:30 am
In Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat) (11 February 2009). [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:29 am by Derek Muller
Judge Graber, joined by Judges Gould and Watford, in No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 3:41 pm by Orin Kerr
(Jeff Chiu/Associated Press) I have posted before about Facebook v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
Although Man Choi Chiu contends that the LLC’s records were incorrect, he cannot subsequently take a position contrary to that taken in the income tax returns which he admitted that he signed (see Mahoney-Buntzman v Buntzman, 12 NY3d 415, 422; Livathinos v Vaughan, 121 AD3d 485; Winship v Winship, 115 AD3d 1328; Czernicki v Lawniczak, 74 AD3d 1121, 1125; Peterson v Neville, 58 AD3d 489). [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:57 am by Broc Romanek
This blog by Cooley’s Cydney Posner describes the circumstances surrounding this new no-action response given to H&R Block a few weeks ago (also see this blog from Ning Chiu). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 3:40 am by Broc Romanek
Here’s news from Davis Polk’s Ning Chiu: The SEC announced a whistleblower award of nearly half a million dollars to a former company officer whose report of misconduct resulted in an SEC enforcement action. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:33 am by Broc Romanek
Here’s the intro from this blog by Davis Polk’s Ning Chiu: The SEC instituted a cease-and-desist proceeding in a fairly straightforward enforcement action that nonetheless emphasizes the importance of the requirement that GAAP measures must be provided with “equal or greater prominence” when a company discloses non-GAAP measures. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:33 am by Peter Groves
The Trade Union Congress was influential in getting them included in the Act, and my friend Lord Lloyd of Kilgerran took the leading role (I think) in piloting them through Parliament, but they hardly ever deliver for the employee-inventor (Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat) being the single swallow that could not make a summer). [read post]