Search for: "Choctaw Nation v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm by Ed Gehres
However, the answer was swallowed by additional questions, and remained for the United States to deal with more fully. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
But the United States or the Court cannot grant to Indian nations power the tribes already possess. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
United States applies retroactively, noting that the Court “may well be on the verge of doing something it hasn’t done in decades (and of settling a messy, messy circuit split in the process). [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm by Ed Gehres
For the tribe and the United States, the case remains about the issue of consent: did Dollar General consent to jurisdiction through its range of actions within the Choctaw reservation? [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The United States declined to proceed with a criminal complaint, and the minor and his parents then sued Dollar General and its employee in tribal court, seeking damages relating to the child’s injuries. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:29 am by Lyle Denniston
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, whether Indian tribal courts have authority to try cases against non-Indian businesses and individuals involved in commercial dealings with the tribe; and, in Bruce v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:15 am by Kate Fort
Having disparate interpretations of ICWA was certainly not the intent of Congress in passing a federal law, and conflicts with the rationale of the Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:51 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act; funding regulations)Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:04 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Goldtooth (aiding & abetting robbery on Indian reservation) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlCases featured: Wisconsin v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (480US202) — State laws can’t touch tribal bingo Take Our Poll Match-up No. 16 (10) Choctaw Nation v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States defeats (27) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (207US564) — Recognizing tribal water rights by treaty v. (27) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 11:16 am by David Kopel
L. 294 (2000) (cited in United States v. [read post]