Search for: "Chris Sagers"
Results 81 - 94
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2009, 6:41 pm
I think Chris Sagers’ article “The Myth of Privatization” (59 Admin. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
Chris Sagers had exactly the same reaction and proceeded to write a book about it. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:16 pm
The bill does not violate Klein as Sager defines it. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
" I attribute this interest largely to three people: Antonin Scalia, whose Smith decision continues to prompt efforts to define religion as special to overcome or get around Smith; Chris Eisgruber and Larry Sager (for present purposes, I will treat them as one composite person with an unusually large number of hands and feet), whose work on Equal Liberty has many of us asking whether equal liberty is all there is in law and religion; and Brian Leiter, whose recent… [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:54 am
Sager KF4550 .S235 2004 ThomCat |Amazon.com Law and the Disordered: An Exploration in Mental Health, Law, and Politics George C. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
. * News organizations brief by Kelli Sager and others. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 11:31 am
’” On the opposite end of the ideological spectrum, Professors Chris Sagers and Joshua Davis wrote a March 13, 2017, piece for The New York Times declaring: “A chilling little bill is working its way through Congress. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:43 am
But while the strict scrutiny test in race and free speech cases was generally seen as “strict in theory, fatal in fact” (Gerry Gunther’s phrase), almost always invalidating the government law, in religious freedom cases it was “strict in theory, feeble in fact” (Larry Sager and Chris Eisgruber’s phrase). [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:01 pm
And if you want a deep dive on the issue, you should read my friend Chris Sager’s outstanding book “United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 4:07 pm
But while the “strict scrutiny” test in race and free speech cases was generally seen as “strict in theory, fatal in fact” (Gerry Gunther’s phrase), almost always invalidating the government law, in religious freedom cases it was “strict in theory, feeble in fact” (Larry Sager & Chris Eisgruber’s phrase). [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:25 am
While the “strict scrutiny” test in race and free speech cases was generally seen as “strict in theory, fatal in fact” (Gerry Gunther’s phrase), almost always invalidating the government law, in religious freedom cases it was “strict in theory, feeble in fact” (Larry Sager & Chris Eisgruber’s phrase).And that was likely inevitable, for reasons I discussed in my A Common-Law Model for Religious Exemptions article. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Eagleman, Uneven bars: age rules, antitrust, and amateurism in women’s gymnastics, 40 UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE LAW REVIEW 587 (2011)Chris Sagers, Why Copperweld was actually kind o [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
(Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg) The Supreme Court has just agreed to hear Packingham v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
The plot was fully revealed, however, when The New York Times published columns by Paul Krugman and Chris Sagers on April 18 and April 29, now more boldly asserting that “growing monopoly power is a big problem” and that “profits are at near-record highs” due to declining competition. [read post]
