Search for: "Christian Louboutin S.A."
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2022, 7:06 am
Because in a decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:45 am
” Put differently, if the one doing the copying believes the customer won’t fall for the fake without a label, the product design likely does not rise to the level of trade dress. [1] Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
It was said, in the important ruling in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent 29-30- that:‘We conclude, based on the record before us, that Louboutin has not established secondary meaning in an application of a red sole to a red shoe, but only where the red sole contrasts with the “upper” of the shoe. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
As another example, in Christian Louboutin, S.A. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
As another example, in Christian Louboutin, S.A. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law Symposium Sorry, guys, I did not follow the patent panels.Panel III: Trademarks Rebecca Tushnet, Fixing Incontestability: The Next FrontierIncontestability is a nearly unique feature of American trademark law, with a unique American implementation. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:28 pm
– 9th Circuit Court of Appeals petition for rehearing – April 4, 2013 Designer Denied Say in Louboutin Mark Change: Courthouse News: http://www.entlawdigest.com/2013/03/13/2220.htm Original case was Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:11 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
In September, the Second Circuit issued a widely anticipated opinion regarding in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
Written by Susan Neuberger Weller In its recent decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:32 am
In the case of Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:16 am
In Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:36 pm
At long last, here is a pdf link to the decision, and here is the Second Circuit Court of Appeals summary in a nutshell: “We conclude that the District Court’s holding that a single color can never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry, Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
