Search for: "Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Inc" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2011, 6:04 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Because in a decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc., No. 11-3303-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm by Afro Leo
  A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here  in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in… [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:21 am by Erik
Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., 696 F.3d 206 (2nd Cir. 2012); Maker’s Mark bourbon’s red wax bottle seal (Maker’s Mark Distillery, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Tucker Chambers
As another example, in Christian Louboutin, S.A. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Tucker Chambers
As another example, in Christian Louboutin, S.A. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]