Search for: "Christie v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2011, 4:02 am
Current state of the law The House of Lords decision in Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] ICR 250 is the leading case in this area. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:01 am
Peters, editor, Precedent in the United States Supreme Court (Springer, February 2014) Wendy Scott & Linda S. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
United States (7-2 per Roberts). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm
REUVENI: The United States thinks Your Honor can be fair and impartial. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:39 am
Menzel v. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
However, according to The Art Newspaper, in the context of other proceedings against Christie's, the Versailles court has stated that the royalty must be paid by sellers, without exception. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
The idea was proposed to Span, which agreed on the understanding that the $300,000 would be paid back, the preferred units would be converted to common units, and Span would end up with a 10% ownership interest in Triumph. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 8:48 pm
United States; (2) Christie v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am
Said Christie: “The point is not whether one agrees with BlackRock's public policy positions, or those of Vanguard, State Street or others. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:16 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeEvidence Did Not Show Purpose of Drug Money's Transport Was to Hide Nature, Source, Location United States, appellee v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:27 pm
C-11-321 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION 2012 U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 2:16 pm
Although the medical value of marijuana has been proven, marijuana is considered a Schedule I drug, which include hallucinogens and narcotics that are frequently abused and have no acceptable medical value for treatment in the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:13 pm
And a final-final USPTO decision can then be appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:54 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has good news for Samsung, and Samsung has already shared it with Judge Koh in a late-night filing. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:00 pm
United States Monday, December 4 Christie v. [read post]
