Search for: "Chung v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
by Maurizio Borghi High Court Chancery Division, 3 February 2012, Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:29 am
But by early January, when the instrument had still not been signed, and when rumours were circulating that the text was undergoing review following the decision of the CJEU in the case of Scarlett Extended v SABAM , the plaintiffs in the UPC case issued proceedings against the State citing failure to implement the Directive and seeking redress based on the Frankovich principle. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:18 am
ECOPRESS v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:00 am
“In creating an international network of research universities, Washington University intends to develop a cohort of future leaders in a global university system and promote global awareness and social responsibility,” says McDonnell Academy Director James V. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
In Maples v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:33 pm
The WSJ’s Jess Bravin and Joanna Chung report on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Maples v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:01 am
" See, Mayfield Trucking Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:57 pm
The case is Sullivan v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
Chung, Mong Koo and Hyundai Motor Company v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:37 am
”Parrish, a partner at the Washington, D.C. office of international law firm King & Spalding and a member of its national appellate and strategic counseling practice group, was involved with the landmark Coleman v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:13 am
http://j.st/pQV United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:01 pm
Stokley v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:58 am
United States v Chung. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
BPAI Statistics Schmirler v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
CHUNG v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:28 pm
This move came in light of the Court’s recent decision in People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
Rather, it is argued that (1) the study by Franck contained findings and conclusions that were unsupported by the results of the study, (2) there is far too little available information upon which to base reliable conclusions about possible bias using quantitative research methods, and (3) the more pressing concern is perceived bias arising from institutional factors.The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality Michael Waibel , Asha Kaushal , Kwo-Hwa Chung and Claire… [read post]
