Search for: "Chung v. Tax" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2023, 10:36 am by Howard Bashman
” Andrew Chung of Reuters reports that “US Supreme Court’s Alito rejects recusal in tax case. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
The ADA’s Power to Reduce Overdose Deaths in Prison September 22, 2022 | Erica V. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
Cigarettes face a $1.01 a pack federal tax and an average of $1.91 in state taxes. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Tax: Derivative ContractsMacDonald v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” Leah Litman analyzes yesterday’s argument in Shular v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by sydniemery
Professor Camp was quoted in the following article: Steven Chung, Tax Court Decides Whether a Tax on Marijuana Sales is an Unconstitutionally Excessive Fine, Above the Law (Nov. 13, 2019, 11:50 am), available at: https://abovethelaw.com/2019/11/tax-court-decides-whether-a-tax-on-marijuana-sales-is-an-unconstitutionally-excessive-fine/. 2. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Alan Morrison weighs in last week’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
The justices wrap up the first week of the January session today with one oral argument, in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
Loos, in which the justices will decide whether a railroad’s payment to an employee for time lost from work can be taxed under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: Following Lucia v. [read post]